Why did you write such a long book? (913K)
It has been said that 90% of all that is known about the brain has
been learned since 1990. What difference has neuroscience made to
our understanding? (1116K)
Did your views change in the process of writing the book? (1190K)
Can I ask about brand representation? Do brand circles, pyramids and
onions have any validity for you now? (1358K)
Surely if a brand idea exists as a pattern not a hierarchy it works
very differently? (1698K)
How does brand positioning work in a neural network? (1320K)
So you have different groups of brands in the awareness set, in the
consideration set and in the purchase repertoire... (1679K)
What
are the implications for research into brands? (1.5Mb)
In
the book you make the point that existing users have much stronger
brand perceptions... (681K)
So you're saying tracking studies measure the association the wrong
way? (925K)
If most of the communication is received unconsciously then how much
attention should we pay to conscious learning? Shouldn't we concentrate
on giving consumers scripts for new behaviours? (625K)
You have a chapter on brand relationships where you define 4 elements
that have to be present for there to be a genuine relationship...(680K)
I thought you would be a lot more unkind on the research once you
had unpacked the neuroscience. Why weren't you more critical? (1.5MB)
You have compared the way brands work to the Gesamtkunstwerk theory
of art. What's the connection? (1.6MB)
Can you give me an example? (717K)
Jeremy Bullmore talks about people assembling brands the way birds
make nests. Though perhaps it's more like IKEA providing the flatpack
for the consumer to build to a design. Where does the audience fit
within this? (1MB)
What about shared meanings? (945K)
So in summary is this book an argument or an encyclopaedia? (980K)
Is there a sequel? (297K)